[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200121122458.GA9365@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 07:24:59 -0500
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
To: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, bob.liu@...cle.com, axboe@...nel.dk,
agk@...hat.com, dm-devel@...hat.com, song@...nel.org,
tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
Chaitanya.Kulkarni@....com, darrick.wong@...cle.com,
ming.lei@...hat.com, osandov@...com, jthumshirn@...e.de,
minwoo.im.dev@...il.com, damien.lemoal@....com,
andrea.parri@...rulasolutions.com, hare@...e.com, tj@...nel.org,
ajay.joshi@....com, sagi@...mberg.me, dsterba@...e.com,
bvanassche@....org, dhowells@...hat.com, asml.silence@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] dm: Directly disable max_allocate_sectors for now
On Tue, Jan 21 2020 at 5:42am -0500,
Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com> wrote:
> Since dm inherits limits from underlining block devices,
> this patch directly disables max_allocate_sectors for dm
> till full allocation support is implemented.
>
> This prevents high-level primitives (generic_make_request_checks(),
> __blkdev_issue_write_zeroes(), ...) from sending REQ_ALLOCATE
> requests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
> ---
> drivers/md/dm-table.c | 2 ++
> drivers/md/md.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
You're mixing DM and MD changes in the same patch.
But I'm wondering if it might be best to set this default for stacking
devices in blk_set_stacking_limits()?
And then it is up to each stacking driver to override as needed.
Mike
Powered by blists - more mailing lists