[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200121091456-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 09:15:14 -0500
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"tiwei.bie@...el.com" <tiwei.bie@...el.com>,
"maxime.coquelin@...hat.com" <maxime.coquelin@...hat.com>,
"cunming.liang@...el.com" <cunming.liang@...el.com>,
"zhihong.wang@...el.com" <zhihong.wang@...el.com>,
"rob.miller@...adcom.com" <rob.miller@...adcom.com>,
"xiao.w.wang@...el.com" <xiao.w.wang@...el.com>,
"haotian.wang@...ive.com" <haotian.wang@...ive.com>,
"lingshan.zhu@...el.com" <lingshan.zhu@...el.com>,
"eperezma@...hat.com" <eperezma@...hat.com>,
"lulu@...hat.com" <lulu@...hat.com>,
Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com>,
"kevin.tian@...el.com" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
"stefanha@...hat.com" <stefanha@...hat.com>,
"rdunlap@...radead.org" <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>,
"aadam@...hat.com" <aadam@...hat.com>,
"jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com" <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@...lanox.com>,
"hanand@...inx.com" <hanand@...inx.com>,
"mhabets@...arflare.com" <mhabets@...arflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] vDPA: introduce vDPA bus
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 02:12:05PM +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 04:56:06PM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > For vfio? vfio is the only thing I am aware doing
> > > that, and this is not vfio..
> >
> > vfio is not doing anything. anyone can use a combination
> > of unbind and driver_override to attach a driver to a device.
> >
> > It's not a great interface but it's there without any code,
> > and it will stay there without maintainance overhead
> > if we later add a nicer one.
>
> Well, it is not a great interface, and it is only really used in
> normal cases by vfio.
>
> I don't think it is a good idea to design new subsystems with that
> idea in mind, particularly since detatching the vdpa driver would not
> trigger destruction of the underlying dynamic resource (ie the SF).
>
> We need a way to trigger that destruction..
>
> Jason
You wanted a netlink command for this, right?
--
MST
Powered by blists - more mailing lists