[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bd3126fff15641098af2a4ac2164f3c4@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 14:59:35 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Peter Zijlstra' <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
"Naveen N . Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Anil S Keshavamurthy" <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <thoiland@...hat.com>,
"Jean-Tsung Hsiao" <jhsiao@...hat.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
"Masami Hiramatsu" <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [for-linus][PATCH 2/5] tracing/uprobe: Fix double perf_event
linking on multiprobe uprobe
From: Peter Zijlstra
> Sent: 21 January 2020 14:50
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 09:38:49AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_probe.h b/kernel/trace/trace_probe.h
> > index 4ee703728aec..03e4e180058d 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_probe.h
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_probe.h
> > @@ -230,6 +230,7 @@ struct trace_probe_event {
> > struct trace_event_call call;
> > struct list_head files;
> > struct list_head probes;
> > + char data[0];
> > };
>
> Note that this relies on pure 'luck'. If you stick anything <4 bytes in
> between the list_head and the data member it'll come unstuck real fast.
Can you fix it by adding an unnamed struct as in:
struct trace_probe_event {
struct {
struct trace_event_call call;
struct list_head files;
struct list_head probes;
};
char data[0];
};
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists