lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200121152355.GB572414@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Jan 2020 16:23:55 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Sandesh Kenjana Ashok <sandeshkenjanaashok@...il.com>
Cc:     Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: mt7621-pinctrl: Align to fix warnings of line
 over 80 characters

On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 02:47:05PM +0100, Sandesh Kenjana Ashok wrote:
> Issue found by checkpatch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sandesh Kenjana Ashok <sandeshkenjanaashok@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/mt7621-pinctrl/pinctrl-rt2880.c | 11 ++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/mt7621-pinctrl/pinctrl-rt2880.c b/drivers/staging/mt7621-pinctrl/pinctrl-rt2880.c
> index d0f06790d38f..df5da5fce630 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/mt7621-pinctrl/pinctrl-rt2880.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/mt7621-pinctrl/pinctrl-rt2880.c
> @@ -159,7 +159,8 @@ static int rt2880_pmx_group_enable(struct pinctrl_dev *pctrldev,
>  }
>  
>  static int rt2880_pmx_group_gpio_request_enable(struct pinctrl_dev *pctrldev,
> -						struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range,
> +						struct pinctrl_gpio_range
> +						*range,

Ick, that looks worse now, right?  checkpatch is a guideline, not a
hard-and-fast rule here.

>  						unsigned int pin)
>  {
>  	struct rt2880_priv *p = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctrldev);
> @@ -218,10 +219,10 @@ static int rt2880_pinmux_index(struct rt2880_priv *p)
>  	p->func_count++;
>  
>  	/* allocate our function and group mapping index buffers */
> -	f = p->func = devm_kcalloc(p->dev,
> -				   p->func_count,
> -				   sizeof(struct rt2880_pmx_func),
> -				   GFP_KERNEL);
> +	f = p->func;
> +	p->func =  devm_kcalloc(p->dev, p->func_count,
> +				sizeof(struct rt2880_pmx_func), GFP_KERNEL);
> +

You broke the code here :(

Please learn a bit more about how C works before attempting to work on
kernel code.

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ