linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/2] Fixing libfc memory leaks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 20 Jan 2020 23:56:24 -0500
From:   "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To:     hare@...e.de
Cc:     Igor Druzhinin <igor.druzhinin@...rix.com>,
        <fcoe-devel@...n-fcoe.org>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/2] Fixing libfc memory leaks


Hannes,

> Could you take a look at those?
> At least the first one causes noticeable memory decline over time
> for some of our deployments.
>
> Igor Druzhinin (2):
>   scsi: libfc: free response frame from GPN_ID
>   scsi: libfc: drop extra rport reference in fc_rport_create()
>
>  drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_disc.c  | 2 ++
>  drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c | 4 +++-
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Please review!

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering