[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200121162157.GD4656@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 16:21:57 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Zha Qipeng <qipeng.zha@...el.com>,
"David E . Box" <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/38] platform/x86: Rework intel_scu_ipc and
intel_pmc_ipc drivers
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 07:00:36PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> Currently both intel_scu_ipc.c and intel_pmc_ipc.c implement the same SCU
> IPC communications with minor differences. This duplication does not make
> much sense so this series reworks the two drivers so that there is only a
> single implementation of the SCU IPC. In addition to that the API will be
This is a 40 (!) patch series and looking at the subjects and diffstat I
can't tell if there's something in particular that you're looking for me
to review?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists