linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 15/26] docs: i2c: smbus-protocol: enable kernel-doc function syntax

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <211da679-154f-15e3-52d3-a24d50c526cf@lucaceresoli.net>
Date:   Tue, 21 Jan 2020 18:31:23 +0100
From:   Luca Ceresoli <luca@...aceresoli.net>
To:     Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
Cc:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
        Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/26] docs: i2c: smbus-protocol: enable kernel-doc
 function syntax

Hi Jean,

On 20/01/20 15:44, Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Sun,  5 Jan 2020 23:50:01 +0100, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
>> Hyperlinks from function names are not generated in headings. Move them in
>> the plain text so they are rendered as clickable hyerlinks.
> 
> typo: hyperlinks

Ok.

>>
>> While there also remove an unneeded colon in a heading.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca@...aceresoli.net>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/i2c/smbus-protocol.rst | 64 ++++++++++++++++++----------
>>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/i2c/smbus-protocol.rst b/Documentation/i2c/smbus-protocol.rst
>> index 10c4a989982c..997945e90419 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/i2c/smbus-protocol.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/i2c/smbus-protocol.rst
>> @@ -62,8 +62,10 @@ This sends a single bit to the device, at the place of the Rd/Wr bit::
>>  Functionality flag: I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_QUICK
>>  
>>  
>> -SMBus Receive Byte:  i2c_smbus_read_byte()
>> -==========================================
>> +SMBus Receive Byte
>> +==================
>> +
>> +Implemented by i2c_smbus_read_byte()
> 
> In file i2c-protocol.rst, the wording used is:
> 
> This corresponds to i2c_transfer().
> 
> For consistency, can we settle for "Implemented by foo()" everywhere?

Good point. For v2 I added a new patch to use "Implemented by" also in
i2c-protocol.rst.

Thanks.

By extrapolation I guess you want to review the few remaining patches.
Correnct? In this case I'd wait for that before sending out v2.

-- 
Luca