linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v5 00/57] objtool: Add support for arm64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 21 Jan 2020 11:50:01 -0600
From:   Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Julien Thierry <jthierry@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, raphael.gault@....com,
        catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v5 00/57] objtool: Add support for arm64

On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 04:07:11PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 04:02:03PM +0000, Julien Thierry wrote:
> > In the mean time, any feedback on the current state is appreciated.
> > 
> > * Patches 1 to 18 adapts the current objtool code to make it easier to
> >   support new architectures.
> 
> In the interrest of moving things along; I've looked through these
> and 1-14,16 look good to me, 17,18 hurt my brain.
> 
> Josh, what say you?

Agreed.

Julien, thanks a lot for splitting these up nicely.  If you post 1-14
(updated based on the recent comments), we can look at merging those
sooner.

15-18 also hurt my brain -- probably a symptom of the existing fragile
mess -- so I'll need to spend more time staring at them.

-- 
Josh