[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200122135741.12123-1-dafna.hirschfeld@collabora.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 14:57:41 +0100
From: Dafna Hirschfeld <dafna.hirschfeld@...labora.com>
To: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: agross@...nel.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dafna.hirschfeld@...labora.com,
helen.koike@...labora.com, ezequiel@...labora.com,
kernel@...labora.com, dafna3@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH] dt-bindings: fix warnings in validation of qcom,gcc.yaml
The last example in qcom,gcc.yaml set 'sleep' as the second
value of 'clock-names'. According to the schema is should
be 'sleep_clk'. Fix the example to conform the schema.
This fixes a warning when validating the schema:
"clock-names: ... is not valid under any of the given schemas"
Signed-off-by: Dafna Hirschfeld <dafna.hirschfeld@...labora.com>
---
I tested this patch on top of the patch
"dt-binding: fix compilation error of the example in qcom,gcc.yaml"
which fixes a compilation error in this file
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.yaml | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.yaml
index 50ff07f80acb..cac1150c9292 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.yaml
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ examples:
<0>,
<0>;
clock-names = "xo",
- "sleep",
+ "sleep_clk",
"usb3_pipe",
"ufs_rx_symbol0",
"ufs_rx_symbol1",
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists