lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0813a57a-093b-2aae-b037-f0a4955c716a@arm.com>
Date:   Wed, 22 Jan 2020 14:22:30 +0000
From:   Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
To:     Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/fair: Optimize select_idle_core

On 22/01/2020 13:55, Mel Gorman wrote:
> 
> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
> 
> I'm a bit surprised to not see this in linux-next or tip. Did this get
> rejected or did it accidentally get overlooked because the subject is so
> similar to 60588bfa223f ("sched/fair: Optimize select_idle_cpu") ?
> 

Most likely the latter; I also had completely forgotten about it and had to
retrace where and when I reviewed that...

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ