[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200122163857.4605-1-cai@lca.pw>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 11:38:57 -0500
From: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
To: mingo@...hat.com
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, will@...nel.org, elver@...gle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
Subject: [PATCH] locking/osq_lock: fix a data race in osq_wait_next
KCSAN complains,
write (marked) to 0xffff941ca3b3be00 of 8 bytes by task 670 on cpu 6:
osq_lock+0x24c/0x340
__mutex_lock+0x277/0xd20
mutex_lock_nested+0x31/0x40
memcg_create_kmem_cache+0x2e/0x190
memcg_kmem_cache_create_func+0x40/0x80
process_one_work+0x54c/0xbe0
worker_thread+0x80/0x650
kthread+0x1e0/0x200
ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50
read to 0xffff941ca3b3be00 of 8 bytes by task 703 on cpu 44:
osq_lock+0x18e/0x340
__mutex_lock+0x277/0xd20
mutex_lock_nested+0x31/0x40
memcg_create_kmem_cache+0x2e/0x190
memcg_kmem_cache_create_func+0x40/0x80
process_one_work+0x54c/0xbe0
worker_thread+0x80/0x650
kthread+0x1e0/0x200
ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50
which points to those lines in osq_wait_next(),
next = xchg(&node->next, NULL);
if (next)
break;
Since only the read is outside of critical sections, fixed it by adding
a READ_ONCE().
Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
---
kernel/locking/osq_lock.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/osq_lock.c b/kernel/locking/osq_lock.c
index 6ef600aa0f47..8f565165019a 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/osq_lock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/osq_lock.c
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ osq_wait_next(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock,
*/
if (node->next) {
next = xchg(&node->next, NULL);
- if (next)
+ if (READ_ONCE(next))
break;
}
--
2.21.0 (Apple Git-122.2)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists