linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH v4 2/6] sched/cpufreq: Attach perf domain to sugov policy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200122173538.1142069-3-douglas.raillard@arm.com>
Date:   Wed, 22 Jan 2020 17:35:34 +0000
From:   Douglas RAILLARD <douglas.raillard@....com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
        viresh.kumar@...aro.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org
Cc:     douglas.raillard@....com, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
        qperret@...gle.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 2/6] sched/cpufreq: Attach perf domain to sugov policy

Attach an Energy Model perf_domain to each sugov_policy to prepare the
ground for energy-aware schedutil.

Signed-off-by: Douglas RAILLARD <douglas.raillard@....com>
---
 kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index 9b8916fd00a2..09e284dc918a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -42,6 +42,10 @@ struct sugov_policy {
 
 	bool			limits_changed;
 	bool			need_freq_update;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL
+	struct em_perf_domain *pd;
+#endif
 };
 
 struct sugov_cpu {
@@ -66,6 +70,40 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sugov_cpu, sugov_cpu);
 
 /************************ Governor internals ***********************/
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL
+static void sugov_policy_attach_pd(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy)
+{
+	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = sg_policy->policy;
+	struct em_perf_domain *pd;
+
+	sg_policy->pd = NULL;
+	pd = em_cpu_get(policy->cpu);
+	if (!pd)
+		return;
+
+	if (cpumask_equal(policy->related_cpus, to_cpumask(pd->cpus))) {
+		sg_policy->pd = pd;
+	} else {
+		pr_warn("%s: Not all CPUs in schedutil policy %u share the same perf domain, no perf domain for that policy will be registered\n",
+			__func__, policy->cpu);
+	}
+}
+
+static struct em_perf_domain *
+sugov_policy_get_pd(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy)
+{
+	return sg_policy->pd;
+}
+#else /* CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL */
+static void sugov_policy_attach_pd(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy) {}
+
+static struct em_perf_domain *
+sugov_policy_get_pd(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy)
+{
+	return NULL;
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL */
+
 static bool sugov_should_update_freq(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy, u64 time)
 {
 	s64 delta_ns;
@@ -859,6 +897,9 @@ static int sugov_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 							sugov_update_shared :
 							sugov_update_single);
 	}
+
+	sugov_policy_attach_pd(sg_policy);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.24.1