[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4a0d03a0-8cf8-8b55-0db2-4bbcb606454c@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 14:18:40 +0530
From: vishnu <vravulap@....com>
To: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
Ravulapati Vishnu vardhan rao
<Vishnuvardhanrao.Ravulapati@....com>
Cc: Alexander.Deucher@....com, broonie@...nel.org,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Vijendar Mukunda <Vijendar.Mukunda@....com>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
"moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM..."
<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: amd: Fix for Subsequent Playback issue.
On 22/01/20 5:44 AM, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
>
> Hi Ravulapati
>
>> If we play audio back to back, which kills one playback
>> and immediately start another, we can hear clicks.
>> This patch fixes the issue.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ravulapati Vishnu vardhan rao <Vishnuvardhanrao.Ravulapati@....com>
>> ---
> (snip)
>> + kfree(rtd);
>
> Please double check soc_new_pcm_runtime() and
> soc_free_pcm_runtime() at soc-core.c.
> Because rtd is created via devm_kzalloc(),
> and has many related resources which need to be cared when rtd was freed.
> Just kfree() is not good/enough, I think.
>
> I think you want to use is snd_soc_remove_pcm_runtime()
> instead of kfree()
>
> Thank you for your help !!
> Best regards
> ---
> Kuninori Morimoto
>
I will create a separate patch for kfree and separate one for subsequent
play back issue.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists