[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200122085737.GA2511011@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 09:57:37 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: "T.Kohada" <Kohada.Tetsuhiro@...mitsubishielectric.co.jp>
Cc: Mori.Takahiro@...mitsubishielectric.co.jp,
motai.hirotaka@...mitsubishielectric.co.jp,
Valdis Kletnieks <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: exfat: remove fs_func struct.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 03:20:46PM +0900, T.Kohada wrote:
> Remove 'fs_func struct' and change indirect calls to direct calls.
>
> The following issues are described in exfat's TODO.
> > Create helper function for exfat_set_entry_time () and
> > exfat_set_entry_type () because it's sort of ugly to be calling the same functionn directly and other code calling through the fs_func struc ponters ...
>
> The fs_func struct was used for switching the helper functions of fat16/fat32/exfat.
> Now, it has lost the role of switching, just making the code less readable.
>
> Signed-off-by: T.Kohada <Kohada.Tetsuhiro@...MitsubishiElectric.co.jp>
We need a "full" name here, not just an abbreviation, use what you would
for a document.
Also the patch does not apply to the linux-next tree at all, so I can't
take it. Please rebase and resend.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists