[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6a49bf6c-8851-a65c-5606-563776e07c08@st.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 09:20:29 +0000
From: Olivier MOYSAN <olivier.moysan@...com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC: "lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"perex@...ex.cz" <perex@...ex.cz>,
"tiwai@...e.com" <tiwai@...e.com>,
"mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com" <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com"
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ASoC: dt-bindings: stm32: convert spdfirx to
json-schema
Hi Rob,
I did not report your reviewed-by tag, as I have made a extra change in v2.
This change is related to dmas property reported in v2 change log.
Sorry, this extra change was indeed not clearly highlighted in log comments.
Regards
Olivier
On 1/21/20 11:00 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 18:03:52 +0100, Olivier Moysan wrote:
>> Convert the STM32 SPDIFRX bindings to DT schema format using json-schema.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@...com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Add "additionalProperties: false"
>> - Also change minItems to 2 for dmas property, as both DMAs are required.
>>
>> Changes in v3:
>> - Drop minItems/maxItems for dmas property, remove ref to stm32-dma.txt.
>> ---
>> .../bindings/sound/st,stm32-spdifrx.txt | 56 -------------
>> .../bindings/sound/st,stm32-spdifrx.yaml | 80 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
>> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/st,stm32-spdifrx.txt
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/st,stm32-spdifrx.yaml
>>
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
>
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists