linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 045/103] btrfs: fix memory leak in qgroup accounting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200122092810.614009389@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed, 22 Jan 2020 10:29:01 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>,
        Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@....com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 045/103] btrfs: fix memory leak in qgroup accounting

From: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@....com>

commit 26ef8493e1ab771cb01d27defca2fa1315dc3980 upstream.

When running xfstests on the current btrfs I get the following splat from
kmemleak:

unreferenced object 0xffff88821b2404e0 (size 32):
  comm "kworker/u4:7", pid 26663, jiffies 4295283698 (age 8.776s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 10 ff fd 26 82 88 ff ff  ...........&....
    10 ff fd 26 82 88 ff ff 20 ff fd 26 82 88 ff ff  ...&.... ..&....
  backtrace:
    [<00000000f94fd43f>] ulist_alloc+0x25/0x60 [btrfs]
    [<00000000fd023d99>] btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0x41/0x100 [btrfs]
    [<000000008f17bd32>] btrfs_find_all_roots+0x52/0x70 [btrfs]
    [<00000000b7660afb>] btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker+0x343/0x680 [btrfs]
    [<0000000058e66778>] btrfs_work_helper+0xac/0x1e0 [btrfs]
    [<00000000f0188930>] process_one_work+0x1cf/0x350
    [<00000000af5f2f8e>] worker_thread+0x28/0x3c0
    [<00000000b55a1add>] kthread+0x109/0x120
    [<00000000f88cbd17>] ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40

This corresponds to:

  (gdb) l *(btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0x41)
  0x8d7e1 is in btrfs_find_all_roots_safe (fs/btrfs/backref.c:1413).
  1408
  1409            tmp = ulist_alloc(GFP_NOFS);
  1410            if (!tmp)
  1411                    return -ENOMEM;
  1412            *roots = ulist_alloc(GFP_NOFS);
  1413            if (!*roots) {
  1414                    ulist_free(tmp);
  1415                    return -ENOMEM;
  1416            }
  1417

Following the lifetime of the allocated 'roots' ulist, it gets freed
again in btrfs_qgroup_account_extent().

But this does not happen if the function is called with the
'BTRFS_FS_QUOTA_ENABLED' flag cleared, then btrfs_qgroup_account_extent()
does a short leave and directly returns.

Instead of directly returning we should jump to the 'out_free' in order to
free all resources as expected.

CC: stable@...r.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@....com>
[ add comment ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/btrfs/qgroup.c |    6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
@@ -2055,8 +2055,12 @@ int btrfs_qgroup_account_extent(struct b
 	u64 nr_old_roots = 0;
 	int ret = 0;
 
+	/*
+	 * If quotas get disabled meanwhile, the resouces need to be freed and
+	 * we can't just exit here.
+	 */
 	if (!test_bit(BTRFS_FS_QUOTA_ENABLED, &fs_info->flags))
-		return 0;
+		goto out_free;
 
 	if (new_roots) {
 		if (!maybe_fs_roots(new_roots))