[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200122095622.GS14914@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 10:56:22 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Alex Kogan <alex.kogan@...cle.com>
Cc: linux@...linux.org.uk, mingo@...hat.com, will.deacon@....com,
arnd@...db.de, longman@...hat.com, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org,
guohanjun@...wei.com, jglauber@...vell.com,
steven.sistare@...cle.com, daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com,
dave.dice@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 5/5] locking/qspinlock: Introduce the shuffle
reduction optimization into CNA
On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 02:40:42PM -0500, Alex Kogan wrote:
> @@ -251,8 +281,11 @@ __always_inline u32 cna_pre_scan(struct qspinlock *lock,
> struct cna_node *cn = (struct cna_node *)node;
>
> cn->pre_scan_result =
> - cn->intra_count == intra_node_handoff_threshold ?
> - FLUSH_SECONDARY_QUEUE : cna_scan_main_queue(node, node);
> + (node->locked <= 1 && probably(SHUFFLE_REDUCTION_PROB_ARG)) ?
> + PASS_LOCK_IMMEDIATELY :
> + cn->intra_count == intra_node_handoff_threshold ?
> + FLUSH_SECONDARY_QUEUE :
> + cna_scan_main_queue(node, node);
>
> return 0;
> }
Let me just, once again, remind people that the Linux Kernel is not part
of the Obfuscated C code contest.
> Reviewed-by: Steve Sistare <steven.sistare@...cle.com>
Seriously, in what universe is that actually readable code? Steve quick,
say what it does.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists