linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RT 25/32] Revert "cpufreq: drop K8s driver from beeing selected"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200122063404.41760c35@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Wed, 22 Jan 2020 06:34:04 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>,
        John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
        Julia Cartwright <julia@...com>,
        Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>,
        Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 25/32] Revert "cpufreq: drop K8s driver from beeing
 selected"

On Wed, 22 Jan 2020 09:38:09 +0100
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de> wrote:

> On 2020-01-17 12:41:36 [-0500], Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > 4.19.94-rt39-rc1 stable review patch.
> > If anyone has any objections, please let me know.  
> 
> We (and by we I mean Boris) tried to reproduce it on the actual HW and
> failed. So I assumed that the bug is no longer present in the devel tree
> which was tested (and most likely fixed in the meantime). I can't say
> the same with confidence for the v4.19 tree.
> I think it would be best if that one would not be backported.

OK, I will drop this one.

Thanks for looking at these!

-- Steve