[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200122092839.158437396@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 10:27:42 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 076/222] locking/lockdep: Fix buffer overrun problem in stack_trace[]
From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
commit d91f3057263ceb691ef527e71b41a56b17f6c869 upstream.
If the lockdep code is really running out of the stack_trace entries,
it is likely that buffer overrun can happen and the data immediately
after stack_trace[] will be corrupted.
If there is less than LOCK_TRACE_SIZE_IN_LONGS entries left before
the call to save_trace(), the max_entries computation will leave it
with a very large positive number because of its unsigned nature. The
subsequent call to stack_trace_save() will then corrupt the data after
stack_trace[]. Fix that by changing max_entries to a signed integer
and check for negative value before calling stack_trace_save().
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Fixes: 12593b7467f9 ("locking/lockdep: Reduce space occupied by stack traces")
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191220135128.14876-1-longman@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ static struct lock_trace *save_trace(voi
struct lock_trace *trace, *t2;
struct hlist_head *hash_head;
u32 hash;
- unsigned int max_entries;
+ int max_entries;
BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2(STACK_TRACE_HASH_SIZE);
BUILD_BUG_ON(LOCK_TRACE_SIZE_IN_LONGS >= MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES);
@@ -490,10 +490,8 @@ static struct lock_trace *save_trace(voi
trace = (struct lock_trace *)(stack_trace + nr_stack_trace_entries);
max_entries = MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES - nr_stack_trace_entries -
LOCK_TRACE_SIZE_IN_LONGS;
- trace->nr_entries = stack_trace_save(trace->entries, max_entries, 3);
- if (nr_stack_trace_entries >= MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES -
- LOCK_TRACE_SIZE_IN_LONGS - 1) {
+ if (max_entries <= 0) {
if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock())
return NULL;
@@ -502,6 +500,7 @@ static struct lock_trace *save_trace(voi
return NULL;
}
+ trace->nr_entries = stack_trace_save(trace->entries, max_entries, 3);
hash = jhash(trace->entries, trace->nr_entries *
sizeof(trace->entries[0]), 0);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists