[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <157966227494.2508551.7206194169374588977.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 19:04:35 -0800
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, x86@...nel.org,
Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@...il.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/6] Memory Hierarchy: Enable target node lookups for
reserved memory
Changes since v3 [1]:
- Cleanup numa_map_to_online_node() to remove redundant "if
(!node_online(node))" (Aneesh)
[1]: http://lore.kernel.org/r/157954696789.2239526.17707265517154476652.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
---
Merge notes:
x86 folks: This has an ack from Rafael for ACPI, and Michael for Power.
With an x86 ack I plan to take this through the libnvdimm tree provided
the x86 touches look ok to you.
---
Cover:
Arrange for platform numa info to be preserved for determining
'target_node' data. Where a 'target_node' is the node a reserved memory
range will become when it is onlined.
This new infrastructure is expected to be more valuable over time for
Memory Tiers / Hierarchy management as more platforms (via the ACPI HMAT
and EFI Specific Purpose Memory) publish reserved or "soft-reserved"
ranges to Linux. Linux system administrators will expect to be able to
interact with those ranges with a unique numa node number when/if that
memory is onlined via the dax_kmem driver [2].
One configuration that currently fails to properly convey the target
node for the resulting memory hotplug operation is persistent memory
defined by the memmap=nn!ss parameter. For example, today if node1 is a
memory only node, and all the memory from node1 is specified to
memmap=nn!ss and subsequently onlined, it will end up being onlined as
node0 memory. As it stands, memory_add_physaddr_to_nid() can only
identify online nodes and since node1 in this example has no online cpus
/ memory the target node is initialized node0.
The fix is to preserve rather than discard the numa_meminfo entries that
are relevant for reserved memory ranges, and to uplevel the node
distance helper for determining the "local" (closest) node relative to
an initiator node.
[2]: https://pmem.io/ndctl/daxctl-reconfigure-device.html
---
Dan Williams (6):
ACPI: NUMA: Up-level "map to online node" functionality
mm/numa: Skip NUMA_NO_NODE and online nodes in numa_map_to_online_node()
powerpc/papr_scm: Switch to numa_map_to_online_node()
x86/mm: Introduce CONFIG_KEEP_NUMA
x86/numa: Provide a range-to-target_node lookup facility
libnvdimm/e820: Retrieve and populate correct 'target_node' info
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c | 21 --------
arch/x86/Kconfig | 1
arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c | 41 ----------------
drivers/nvdimm/e820.c | 18 ++-----
include/linux/acpi.h | 23 +++++++++
include/linux/numa.h | 23 +++++++++
mm/Kconfig | 5 ++
mm/mempolicy.c | 31 ++++++++++++
9 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists