[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200123082322.GB10328@zn.tnic>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 09:23:22 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Shiping Ji <shiping.linux@...il.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-edac <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, hangl@...rosoft.com,
Lei Wang <lewan@...rosoft.com>, ruizhao@...rosoft.com,
shji@...rosoft.com, Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>,
Yuqing Shen <yuqing.shen@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/2] dt-bindings: edac: dmc-520.yaml
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 04:31:07PM -0800, Shiping Ji wrote:
> This is the device tree bindings for new EDAC driver dmc520_edac.c.
>
> From: Lei Wang <leiwang_git@...look.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Lei Wang <leiwang_git@...look.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shiping Ji <shiping.linux@...il.com>
> Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
>
> ---
> Changes in v10:
> - Convert to the YAML format for binding description
So you've changed this patch considerably. If you do so, you cannot keep
Reviewed-by tags.
Also, AFAICT, you've written a completely *new* patch which would mean
that this time you're the author. Correct?
If so, you don't need to keep Lei's From.
In any case, please take some time to read this:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/index.html
It is a lot so do concentrate on the whole process, i.e., this:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/development-process.html
so that you have a basic idea.
If you have questions, I'm sure Sasha would be willing to answer them
even if he's away now.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists