linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] regulator: arizona-ldo1: Improve handling of regulator unbinding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200123114805.GA5440@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Thu, 23 Jan 2020 11:48:05 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Cc:     lee.jones@...aro.org, lgirdwood@...il.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...nsource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] regulator: arizona-ldo1: Improve handling of
 regulator unbinding

On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 09:26:39AM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote:

> 3) We could look at doing something in regmap IRQ to change when
> it does PM runtime calls, it is regmap doing runtime gets when
> drivers remove IRQs that causes the issue. But my accessment was
> that what regmap is doing makes perfect sense, so I don't think
> this is a good approach.

Why do you even care about the errors?  It's not like this device is
going to get removed in a production system and the primary IRQ will be
disabled when the core is removed, this is just something that happens
during development isn't it?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)