[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ada03416b1b362fa255feb45257414655d8ab023.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 14:27:19 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, masahisa.kojima@...aro.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
peterhuewe@....de, jgg@...pe.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] tpm: tis: add support for MMIO TPM on SynQuacer
On Tue, 2020-01-14 at 15:16 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> When fitted, the SynQuacer platform exposes its SPI TPM via a MMIO
> window that is backed by the SPI command sequencer in the SPI bus
> controller. This arrangement has the limitation that only byte size
> accesses are supported, and so we'll need to provide a separate set
> of read and write accessors that take this into account.
What is SynQuacer platform?
I'm also missing a resolution why tpm_tis.c is extended to handle both
and not add tpm_tis_something.c instead. It does not follow the pattern
we have in place (e.g. look up tpm_tis_spi.c).
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists