linux-kernel - Re: [v2 PATCH] mm: move_pages: report the number of non-attempted pages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200123032736.GA22196@richard>
Date:   Thu, 23 Jan 2020 11:27:36 +0800
From:   Wei Yang <richardw.yang@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     mhocko@...e.com, richardw.yang@...ux.intel.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH] mm: move_pages: report the number of non-attempted
 pages

On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 07:38:51AM +0800, Yang Shi wrote:
>Since commit a49bd4d71637 ("mm, numa: rework do_pages_move"),
>the semantic of move_pages() was changed to return the number of
>non-migrated pages (failed to migration) and the call would be aborted
>immediately if migrate_pages() returns positive value.  But it didn't
>report the number of pages that we even haven't attempted to migrate.
>So, fix it by including non-attempted pages in the return value.
>

First, we want to change the semantic of move_pages(2). The return value
indicates the number of pages we didn't managed to migrate?

Second, the return value from migrate_pages() doesn't mean the number of pages
we failed to migrate. For example, one -ENOMEM is returned on the first page,
migrate_pages() would return 1. But actually, no page successfully migrated.

Third, even the migrate_pages() return the exact non-migrate page, we are not
sure those non-migrated pages are at the tail of the list. Because in the last
case in migrate_pages(), it just remove the page from list. It could be a page
in the middle of the list. Then, in userspace, how the return value be
leveraged to determine the valid status? Any page in the list could be the
victim.

Sounds we need to think about this carefully.

>Fixes: a49bd4d71637 ("mm, numa: rework do_pages_move")
>Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
>Cc: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@...ux.intel.com>
>Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>    [4.17+]
>Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
>---
>v2: Rebased on top of the latest mainline kernel per Andrew
>
> mm/migrate.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
>index 86873b6..9b8eb5d 100644
>--- a/mm/migrate.c
>+++ b/mm/migrate.c
>@@ -1627,8 +1627,18 @@ static int do_pages_move(struct mm_struct *mm, nodemask_t task_nodes,
> 			start = i;
> 		} else if (node != current_node) {
> 			err = do_move_pages_to_node(mm, &pagelist, current_node);
>-			if (err)
>+			if (err) {
>+				/*
>+				 * Positive err means the number of failed
>+				 * pages to migrate.  Since we are going to
>+				 * abort and return the number of non-migrated
>+				 * pages, so need incude the rest of the
>+				 * nr_pages that have not attempted as well.
>+				 */
>+				if (err > 0)
>+					err += nr_pages - i - 1;
> 				goto out;
>+			}
> 			err = store_status(status, start, current_node, i - start);
> 			if (err)
> 				goto out;
>@@ -1659,8 +1669,11 @@ static int do_pages_move(struct mm_struct *mm, nodemask_t task_nodes,
> 			goto out_flush;
> 
> 		err = do_move_pages_to_node(mm, &pagelist, current_node);
>-		if (err)
>+		if (err) {
>+			if (err > 0)
>+				err += nr_pages - i - 1;
> 			goto out;
>+		}
> 		if (i > start) {
> 			err = store_status(status, start, current_node, i - start);
> 			if (err)
>@@ -1674,6 +1687,13 @@ static int do_pages_move(struct mm_struct *mm, nodemask_t task_nodes,
> 
> 	/* Make sure we do not overwrite the existing error */
> 	err1 = do_move_pages_to_node(mm, &pagelist, current_node);
>+	/*
>+	 * Don't have to report non-attempted pages here since:
>+	 *     - If the above loop is done gracefully there is not non-attempted
>+	 *       page.
>+	 *     - If the above loop is aborted to it means more fatal error
>+	 *       happened, should return err.
>+	 */
> 	if (!err1)
> 		err1 = store_status(status, start, current_node, i - start);
> 	if (!err)
>-- 
>1.8.3.1

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me