lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 23 Jan 2020 11:59:10 -0700
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     "muraliraja.muniraju" <muraliraja.muniraju@...rik.com>
Cc:     linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Adding multiple workers to the loop device.

On 1/21/20 12:25 PM, muraliraja.muniraju wrote:
> Current loop device implementation has a single kthread worker and
> drains one request at a time to completion. If the underneath device is
> slow then this reduces the concurrency significantly. To help in these
> cases, adding multiple loop workers increases the concurrency. Also to
> retain the old behaviour the default number of loop workers is 1 and can
> be tuned via the ioctl.

Have you considered using blk-mq for this? Right now loop just does
some basic checks and then queues for a thread. If you bump nr_hw_queues
up (provide a parameter for that) and set BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING in the
tag flags, then that might be a more viable approach for handling this.

-- 
Jens Axboe

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ