| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAFd5g47eB42E3X7m_rfmG=vEcMK9dtdAFZT5WjwV3sx3MO0-MQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 13:12:55 -0800
From: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
To: SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
mgorman@...e.de, SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com>,
SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/5] mm/damon: Add kunit tests
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 5:18 AM SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.com> wrote:
>
> From: SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>
>
> This commit adds kunit based unit tests for DAMON.
>
> Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>
Sorry for the late review on this: I am still getting caught up on my
vacation backlog.
> ---
> mm/Kconfig | 11 +
> mm/damon-test.h | 571 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> mm/damon.c | 2 +
> 3 files changed, 584 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 mm/damon-test.h
>
> diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
> index b7af8a1b5cb5..7b023799aa38 100644
> --- a/mm/Kconfig
> +++ b/mm/Kconfig
> @@ -748,4 +748,15 @@ config DAMON
> be 1) accurate enough to be useful for performance-centric domains,
> and 2) sufficiently light-weight so that it can be applied online.
>
> +config DAMON_TEST
To be consistent with other KUnit tests, this should be "DAMON_KUNIT_TEST".
> + bool "Test for damon"
> + depends on DAMON && KUNIT
> + help
> + This builds the DAMON Kunit test suite.
> +
> + For more information on KUnit and unit tests in general, please refer
> + to the KUnit documentation.
> +
> + If unsure, say N.
> +
> endmenu
> diff --git a/mm/damon-test.h b/mm/damon-test.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..0d94910b8fe5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/mm/damon-test.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,571 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/*
> + * Data Access Monitor Unit Tests
> + *
> + * Copyright 2019 Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
> + *
> + * Author: SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>
> + */
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DAMON_TEST
> +
> +#ifndef _DAMON_TEST_H
> +#define _DAMON_TEST_H
> +
> +#include <kunit/test.h>
> +
> +static void damon_test_str_to_pids(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + char *question;
> + unsigned long *answers;
> + unsigned long expected[] = {12, 35, 46};
> + ssize_t nr_integers = 0, i;
> +
> + question = "123";
> + answers = str_to_pids(question, strnlen(question, 128), &nr_integers);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1l, nr_integers);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 123ul, answers[0]);
> + kfree(answers);
> +
> + question = "123abc";
> + answers = str_to_pids(question, strnlen(question, 128), &nr_integers);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1l, nr_integers);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 123ul, answers[0]);
> + kfree(answers);
> +
> + question = "a123";
> + answers = str_to_pids(question, strnlen(question, 128), &nr_integers);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0l, nr_integers);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, answers, (unsigned long *)NULL);
> +
> + question = "12 35";
> + answers = str_to_pids(question, strnlen(question, 128), &nr_integers);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 2l, nr_integers);
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_integers; i++)
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, expected[i], answers[i]);
> + kfree(answers);
> +
> + question = "12 35 46";
> + answers = str_to_pids(question, strnlen(question, 128), &nr_integers);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 3l, nr_integers);
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_integers; i++)
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, expected[i], answers[i]);
> + kfree(answers);
> +
> + question = "12 35 abc 46";
> + answers = str_to_pids(question, strnlen(question, 128), &nr_integers);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 2l, nr_integers);
> + for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, expected[i], answers[i]);
> + kfree(answers);
> +
> + question = "";
> + answers = str_to_pids(question, strnlen(question, 128), &nr_integers);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0l, nr_integers);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, (unsigned long *)NULL, answers);
> + kfree(answers);
> +
> + question = "\n";
> + answers = str_to_pids(question, strnlen(question, 128), &nr_integers);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0l, nr_integers);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, (unsigned long *)NULL, answers);
> + kfree(answers);
> +}
> +
> +static void damon_test_regions(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct damon_region *r;
> + struct damon_task *t;
> +
> + r = damon_new_region(1, 2);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1ul, r->vm_start);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 2ul, r->vm_end);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0u, r->nr_accesses);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, r->sampling_addr >= r->vm_start);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, r->sampling_addr < r->vm_end);
> +
> + t = damon_new_task(42);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0u, nr_damon_regions(t));
> +
> + damon_add_region_tail(r, t);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1u, nr_damon_regions(t));
> +
> + damon_del_region(r);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0u, nr_damon_regions(t));
> +
> + damon_free_task(t);
> +}
> +
> +static void damon_test_tasks(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct damon_task *t;
> +
> + t = damon_new_task(42);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 42ul, t->pid);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0u, nr_damon_tasks());
> +
> + damon_add_task_tail(t);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1u, nr_damon_tasks());
> +
> + damon_destroy_task(t);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0u, nr_damon_tasks());
> +}
> +
> +static void damon_test_set_pids(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + unsigned long pids[] = {1, 2, 3};
> + char buf[64];
> +
> + damon_set_pids(pids, 3);
> + damon_sprint_pids(buf, 64);
> + pr_info("buf: %s (%zu)\n", buf, strlen(buf));
Might want to use kunit_info here so it matches the TAP test log
format. Not a requirement, just an FYI.
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, strncmp(buf, "1 2 3\n", 64));
Here and elsewhere: This should probably use KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ().
> +
> + damon_set_pids(NULL, 0);
> + damon_sprint_pids(buf, 64);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, strncmp(buf, "\n", 64));
> +
> + damon_set_pids((unsigned long []){1, 2}, 2);
> + damon_sprint_pids(buf, 64);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, strncmp(buf, "1 2\n", 64));
> +
> + damon_set_pids((unsigned long []){2}, 1);
> + damon_sprint_pids(buf, 64);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, strncmp(buf, "2\n", 64));
> +
> + damon_set_pids(NULL, 0);
> + damon_sprint_pids(buf, 64);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, strncmp(buf, "\n", 64));
> +}
> +
> +static void damon_test_three_regions_in_vmas(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct region regions[3] = {0,};
> +
> + struct vm_area_struct vmas[] = {
> + (struct vm_area_struct) {.vm_start = 10, .vm_end = 20},
> + (struct vm_area_struct) {.vm_start = 20, .vm_end = 25},
> + (struct vm_area_struct) {.vm_start = 200, .vm_end = 210},
> + (struct vm_area_struct) {.vm_start = 210, .vm_end = 220},
> + (struct vm_area_struct) {.vm_start = 300, .vm_end = 305},
> + (struct vm_area_struct) {.vm_start = 307, .vm_end = 330},
> + };
> + vmas[0].vm_next = &vmas[1];
> + vmas[1].vm_next = &vmas[2];
> + vmas[2].vm_next = &vmas[3];
> + vmas[3].vm_next = &vmas[4];
> + vmas[4].vm_next = &vmas[5];
> + vmas[5].vm_next = NULL;
> +
> + damon_three_regions_in_vmas(&vmas[0], regions);
> +
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 10ul, regions[0].start);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 25ul, regions[0].end);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 200ul, regions[1].start);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 220ul, regions[1].end);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 300ul, regions[2].start);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 330ul, regions[2].end);
It's not obvious to me what property you are proving here. Might want
to add a comment.
> +}
> +
> +/* Clean up global state of damon */
> +static void damon_cleanup_global_state(void)
> +{
> + struct damon_task *t, *next;
> +
> + damon_for_each_task_safe(t, next)
> + damon_destroy_task(t);
> +
> + damon_rbuf_offset = 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void damon_test_aggregate(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + unsigned long pids[] = {1, 2, 3};
> + unsigned long saddr[][3] = {{10, 20, 30}, {5, 42, 49}, {13, 33, 55} };
> + unsigned long eaddr[][3] = {{15, 27, 40}, {31, 45, 55}, {23, 44, 66} };
> + unsigned long accesses[][3] = {{42, 95, 84}, {10, 20, 30}, {0, 1, 2} };
> + struct damon_task *t;
> + struct damon_region *r;
> + int it, ir;
> + ssize_t sz, sr, sp;
> +
> + damon_set_pids(pids, 3);
> +
> + it = 0;
> + damon_for_each_task(t) {
> + for (ir = 0; ir < 3; ir++) {
> + r = damon_new_region(saddr[it][ir], eaddr[it][ir]);
> + r->nr_accesses = accesses[it][ir];
> + damon_add_region_tail(r, t);
> + }
> + it++;
> + }
> + kdamond_flush_aggregated();
I think this test case is also difficult to understand. I think you
probably need at least a comment on what this test case does.
> + it = 0;
> + damon_for_each_task(t) {
> + ir = 0;
> + damon_for_each_region(r, t) {
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0u, r->nr_accesses);
> + ir++;
> + }
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 3, ir);
> + it++;
> + }
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 3, it);
> +
> + sr = sizeof(r->vm_start) + sizeof(r->vm_end) + sizeof(r->nr_accesses);
> + sp = sizeof(t->pid) + sizeof(unsigned int) + 3 * sr;
> + sz = sizeof(struct timespec64) + sizeof(unsigned int) + 3 * sp;
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (unsigned int)sz, damon_rbuf_offset);
> +
> + damon_cleanup_global_state();
> +}
> +
> +static void damon_test_write_rbuf(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + char *data;
> +
> + data = "hello";
> + damon_write_rbuf(data, strnlen(data, 256));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_rbuf_offset, 5u);
> +
> + damon_write_rbuf(data, 0);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_rbuf_offset, 5u);
> +
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, strncmp(damon_rbuf, data, 5), 0);
> +}
> +
> +static void damon_test_update_two_gaps(struct kunit *test)
> +{
I think this test case is also difficult to understand. I think you
probably need at least a comment on what this test case does.
> + struct damon_task *t;
> + struct damon_region *r, *prev = NULL;
> + unsigned long regions[] = {10, 20, 20, 30,
> + 50, 55, 55, 57, 57, 59,
> + 70, 80, 80, 90, 90, 100}; /* 10-30, 50-59, 70-100 */
> + struct region new_regions[3] = {
> + (struct region){.start = 5, .end = 27},
> + (struct region){.start = 45, .end = 55},
> + (struct region){.start = 73, .end = 104} };
> + int i;
> + bool first_gap = true;
> +
> + t = damon_new_task(42);
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(regions) / 2; i++) {
> + r = damon_new_region(regions[i * 2], regions[i * 2 + 1]);
> + damon_add_region_tail(r, t);
> + }
> + damon_add_task_tail(t);
> +
> + damon_apply_three_regions(t, new_regions);
> +
> + damon_for_each_region(r, t) {
> + if (prev == NULL) {
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->vm_start, 5ul);
> + goto next;
> + }
> +
> + if (prev->vm_end != r->vm_start && first_gap) {
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, prev->vm_end, 27ul);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->vm_start, 45ul);
> + first_gap = false;
> + goto next;
> + }
> +
> + if (prev->vm_end != r->vm_start && !first_gap) {
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, prev->vm_end, 55ul);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->vm_start, 73ul);
> + goto next;
> + }
> +
> +next:
> + prev = r;
> + }
> +
> + damon_cleanup_global_state();
> +}
> +
> +static void damon_test_update_two_gaps2(struct kunit *test)
> +{
Same here.
> + struct damon_task *t;
> + struct damon_region *r;
> + /* 10-20-30, 50-55-57-59, 70-80-90-100 */
> + unsigned long regions[] = {10, 20, 20, 30,
> + 50, 55, 55, 57, 57, 59,
> + 70, 80, 80, 90, 90, 100};
> + struct region new_regions[3] = {
> + (struct region){.start = 5, .end = 27},
> + (struct region){.start = 56, .end = 57},
> + (struct region){.start = 65, .end = 104} };
> + /* expect 5-27, 56-57, 65-80-90-104 */
> + unsigned long answers[] = {5, 20, 20, 27,
> + 56, 57,
> + 65, 80, 80, 90, 90, 104};
> + int i;
> +
> + t = damon_new_task(42);
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(regions) / 2; i++) {
> + r = damon_new_region(regions[i * 2], regions[i * 2 + 1]);
> + damon_add_region_tail(r, t);
> + }
> + damon_add_task_tail(t);
> +
> + damon_apply_three_regions(t, new_regions);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(answers) / 2; i++) {
> + r = damon_nth_region_of(t, i);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->vm_start, answers[i * 2]);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->vm_end, answers[i++ * 2 + 1]);
> + }
> +
> + damon_cleanup_global_state();
> +}
> +
> +static void damon_test_update_two_gaps3(struct kunit *test)
> +{
Same here.
> + struct damon_task *t;
> + struct damon_region *r;
> + /* 10-20-30, 50-55-57-59, 70-80-90-100 */
> + unsigned long regions[] = {10, 20, 20, 30,
> + 50, 55, 55, 57, 57, 59,
> + 70, 80, 80, 90, 90, 100};
> + struct region new_regions[3] = {
> + (struct region){.start = 5, .end = 27},
> + (struct region){.start = 61, .end = 63},
> + (struct region){.start = 65, .end = 104} };
> + /* expect 5-27, 56-57, 65-80-90-104 */
> + unsigned long answers[] = {5, 20, 20, 27,
> + 61, 63,
> + 65, 80, 80, 90, 90, 104};
> + int i;
> +
> + t = damon_new_task(42);
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(regions) / 2; i++) {
> + r = damon_new_region(regions[i * 2], regions[i * 2 + 1]);
> + damon_add_region_tail(r, t);
> + }
> + damon_add_task_tail(t);
> +
> + damon_apply_three_regions(t, new_regions);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(answers) / 2; i++) {
> + r = damon_nth_region_of(t, i);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->vm_start, answers[i * 2]);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->vm_end, answers[i++ * 2 + 1]);
> + }
> +
> + damon_cleanup_global_state();
> +}
> +
> +static void damon_test_update_two_gaps4(struct kunit *test)
> +{
Ditto.
> + struct damon_task *t;
> + struct damon_region *r;
> + /* 10-20-30, 50-55-57-59, 70-80-90-100 */
> + unsigned long regions[] = {10, 20, 20, 30,
> + 50, 55, 55, 57, 57, 59,
> + 70, 80, 80, 90, 90, 100};
> + struct region new_regions[3] = {
> + (struct region){.start = 5, .end = 7},
> + (struct region){.start = 30, .end = 32},
> + (struct region){.start = 65, .end = 68} };
> + /* expect 5-27, 56-57, 65-80-90-104 */
> + unsigned long answers[] = {5, 7, 30, 32, 65, 68};
> + int i;
> +
> + t = damon_new_task(42);
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(regions) / 2; i++) {
> + r = damon_new_region(regions[i * 2], regions[i * 2 + 1]);
> + damon_add_region_tail(r, t);
> + }
> + damon_add_task_tail(t);
> +
> + damon_apply_three_regions(t, new_regions);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(answers) / 2; i++) {
> + r = damon_nth_region_of(t, i);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->vm_start, answers[i * 2]);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->vm_end, answers[i++ * 2 + 1]);
> + }
> +
> + damon_cleanup_global_state();
> +}
> +
> +static void damon_test_split_evenly(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct damon_task *t;
> + struct damon_region *r;
> + unsigned long i;
> +
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_split_region_evenly(NULL, 5), -EINVAL);
> +
> + t = damon_new_task(42);
> + r = damon_new_region(0, 100);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_split_region_evenly(r, 0), -EINVAL);
> +
> + damon_add_region_tail(r, t);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_split_region_evenly(r, 10), 0);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, nr_damon_regions(t), 10u);
> +
> + i = 0;
> + damon_for_each_region(r, t) {
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->vm_start, i++ * 10);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->vm_end, i * 10);
> + }
> + damon_free_task(t);
> +
> + t = damon_new_task(42);
> + r = damon_new_region(5, 59);
> + damon_add_region_tail(r, t);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_split_region_evenly(r, 5), 0);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, nr_damon_regions(t), 5u);
> +
> + i = 0;
> + damon_for_each_region(r, t) {
> + if (i == 4)
> + break;
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->vm_start, 5 + 10 * i++);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->vm_end, 5 + 10 * i);
> + }
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->vm_start, 5 + 10 * i);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->vm_end, 59ul);
> + damon_free_task(t);
> +
> + t = damon_new_task(42);
> + r = damon_new_region(5, 6);
> + damon_add_region_tail(r, t);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_split_region_evenly(r, 2), -EINVAL);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, nr_damon_regions(t), 1u);
> +
> + damon_for_each_region(r, t) {
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->vm_start, 5ul);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->vm_end, 6ul);
> + }
> + damon_free_task(t);
> +}
> +
> +static void damon_test_split_at(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct damon_task *t;
> + struct damon_region *r;
> +
> + t = damon_new_task(42);
> + r = damon_new_region(0, 100);
> + damon_add_region_tail(r, t);
> + damon_split_region_at(r, 25);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->vm_start, 0ul);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->vm_end, 25ul);
> +
> + r = damon_next_region(r);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->vm_start, 25ul);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->vm_end, 100ul);
> +
> + damon_free_task(t);
> +}
> +
> +static void damon_test_merge_two(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct damon_task *t;
> + struct damon_region *r, *r2, *r3;
> + int i;
> +
> + t = damon_new_task(42);
> + r = damon_new_region(0, 100);
> + r->nr_accesses = 10;
> + damon_add_region_tail(r, t);
> + r2 = damon_new_region(100, 300);
> + r2->nr_accesses = 20;
> + damon_add_region_tail(r2, t);
> +
> + damon_merge_two_regions(r, r2);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->vm_start, 0ul);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->vm_end, 300ul);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->nr_accesses, 16u);
> +
> + i = 0;
> + damon_for_each_region(r3, t) {
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, r, r3);
> + i++;
> + }
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, 1);
> +
> + damon_free_task(t);
> +}
> +
> +static void damon_test_merge_regions_of(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct damon_task *t;
> + struct damon_region *r;
> + unsigned long sa[] = {0, 100, 114, 122, 130, 156, 170, 184};
> + unsigned long ea[] = {100, 112, 122, 130, 156, 170, 184, 230};
> + unsigned int nrs[] = {0, 0, 10, 10, 20, 30, 1, 2};
> +
> + unsigned long saddrs[] = {0, 114, 130, 156, 170};
> + unsigned long eaddrs[] = {112, 130, 156, 170, 230};
> + int i;
> +
> + t = damon_new_task(42);
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sa); i++) {
> + r = damon_new_region(sa[i], ea[i]);
> + r->nr_accesses = nrs[i];
> + damon_add_region_tail(r, t);
> + }
> +
> + damon_merge_regions_of(t, 9);
> + /* 0-112, 114-130, 130-156, 156-170 */
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, nr_damon_regions(t), 5u);
> + for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
> + r = damon_nth_region_of(t, i);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->vm_start, saddrs[i]);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->vm_end, eaddrs[i]);
> + }
> + damon_free_task(t);
> +}
> +
> +static void damon_test_split_regions_of(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct damon_task *t;
> + struct damon_region *r;
> +
> + t = damon_new_task(42);
> + r = damon_new_region(0, 22);
> + damon_add_region_tail(r, t);
> + damon_split_regions_of(t);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, nr_damon_regions(t), 2u);
> + damon_free_task(t);
> +}
> +
> +static void damon_test_kdamond_need_stop(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, kdamond_need_stop());
> +}
> +
> +static struct kunit_case damon_test_cases[] = {
> + KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_str_to_pids),
> + KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_tasks),
> + KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_regions),
> + KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_set_pids),
> + KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_three_regions_in_vmas),
> + KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_aggregate),
> + KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_write_rbuf),
> + KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_update_two_gaps),
> + KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_update_two_gaps2),
> + KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_update_two_gaps3),
> + KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_update_two_gaps4),
> + KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_split_evenly),
> + KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_split_at),
> + KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_merge_two),
> + KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_merge_regions_of),
> + KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_split_regions_of),
> + KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_kdamond_need_stop),
> + {},
> +};
> +
> +static struct kunit_suite damon_test_suite = {
> + .name = "damon",
> + .test_cases = damon_test_cases,
> +};
> +kunit_test_suite(damon_test_suite);
> +
> +#endif /* _DAMON_TEST_H */
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_DAMON_TEST */
> diff --git a/mm/damon.c b/mm/damon.c
> index 0e99b4875700..c4b6b2db9a8c 100644
> --- a/mm/damon.c
> +++ b/mm/damon.c
> @@ -1262,3 +1262,5 @@ static int __init damon_init(void)
> }
>
> module_init(damon_init);
> +
> +#include "damon-test.h"
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists