lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 23 Jan 2020 13:23:35 -0800
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
        Guan Xuetao <gxt@....edu.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] x86: finish the MPX removal process

On 1/23/20 12:26 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 11:26:38AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 11:23 AM Dave Hansen
>> <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>>> I'd _rather_ this go in via the x86 tree, but I'm not picky.
> Any particular reason why?

I'm confident I can send patches to the x86 maintainers and not make
them too angry.  Sending pull requests to Linus, not so much. :)

I'll just plan to send it to Linus directly.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ