[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200123224035.GA29851@richard>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 06:40:35 +0800
From: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@...ux.intel.com>
To: Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@...ux.intel.com>, mhocko@...e.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH] mm: move_pages: report the number of non-attempted
pages
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 07:56:50PM -0800, Yang Shi wrote:
>
>
>On 1/22/20 7:27 PM, Wei Yang wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 07:38:51AM +0800, Yang Shi wrote:
>> > Since commit a49bd4d71637 ("mm, numa: rework do_pages_move"),
>> > the semantic of move_pages() was changed to return the number of
>> > non-migrated pages (failed to migration) and the call would be aborted
>> > immediately if migrate_pages() returns positive value. But it didn't
>> > report the number of pages that we even haven't attempted to migrate.
>> > So, fix it by including non-attempted pages in the return value.
>> >
>> First, we want to change the semantic of move_pages(2). The return value
>> indicates the number of pages we didn't managed to migrate?
>
>This is my understanding.
>
>>
>> Second, the return value from migrate_pages() doesn't mean the number of pages
>> we failed to migrate. For example, one -ENOMEM is returned on the first page,
>> migrate_pages() would return 1. But actually, no page successfully migrated.
>
>This would not happen at all since migrate_pages() would just return -ENOMEM
>instead of a positive value, right?
>
Oh, you are right.
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
Powered by blists - more mailing lists