lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 24 Jan 2020 09:16:50 -0500
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 020/107] locking/lockdep: Fix buffer overrun problem in stack_trace[]

From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>

[ Upstream commit d91f3057263ceb691ef527e71b41a56b17f6c869 ]

If the lockdep code is really running out of the stack_trace entries,
it is likely that buffer overrun can happen and the data immediately
after stack_trace[] will be corrupted.

If there is less than LOCK_TRACE_SIZE_IN_LONGS entries left before
the call to save_trace(), the max_entries computation will leave it
with a very large positive number because of its unsigned nature. The
subsequent call to stack_trace_save() will then corrupt the data after
stack_trace[]. Fix that by changing max_entries to a signed integer
and check for negative value before calling stack_trace_save().

Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Fixes: 12593b7467f9 ("locking/lockdep: Reduce space occupied by stack traces")
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191220135128.14876-1-longman@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 233459c03b5ae..35d3b6925b1ee 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ static struct lock_trace *save_trace(void)
 	struct lock_trace *trace, *t2;
 	struct hlist_head *hash_head;
 	u32 hash;
-	unsigned int max_entries;
+	int max_entries;
 
 	BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2(STACK_TRACE_HASH_SIZE);
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(LOCK_TRACE_SIZE_IN_LONGS >= MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES);
@@ -490,10 +490,8 @@ static struct lock_trace *save_trace(void)
 	trace = (struct lock_trace *)(stack_trace + nr_stack_trace_entries);
 	max_entries = MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES - nr_stack_trace_entries -
 		LOCK_TRACE_SIZE_IN_LONGS;
-	trace->nr_entries = stack_trace_save(trace->entries, max_entries, 3);
 
-	if (nr_stack_trace_entries >= MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES -
-	    LOCK_TRACE_SIZE_IN_LONGS - 1) {
+	if (max_entries <= 0) {
 		if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock())
 			return NULL;
 
@@ -502,6 +500,7 @@ static struct lock_trace *save_trace(void)
 
 		return NULL;
 	}
+	trace->nr_entries = stack_trace_save(trace->entries, max_entries, 3);
 
 	hash = jhash(trace->entries, trace->nr_entries *
 		     sizeof(trace->entries[0]), 0);
-- 
2.20.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ