[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200124161810.24322-1-guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2020 00:18:10 +0800
From: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-csky@...r.kernel.org, Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Andrew Waterman <andrew@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>
Subject: [PATCH] riscv: Use flush_icache_mm for flush_icache_user_range
The only call path is:
__access_remote_vm -> copy_to_user_page -> flush_icache_user_range
Seems it's ok to use flush_icache_mm instead of flush_icache_all and
it could reduce flush_icache_all called on other harts.
I think the patch is the fixup for the commit 08f051eda33b.
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Andrew Waterman <andrew@...ive.com>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>
---
arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h
index b69aecbb36d3..26589623fd57 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static inline void flush_dcache_page(struct page *page)
* so instead we just flush the whole thing.
*/
#define flush_icache_range(start, end) flush_icache_all()
-#define flush_icache_user_range(vma, pg, addr, len) flush_icache_all()
+#define flush_icache_user_range(vma, pg, addr, len) flush_icache_mm(vma->vm_mm, 0)
void dma_wbinv_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end);
void dma_wb_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end);
--
2.17.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists