[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200124180127.GO1908628@ripper>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:01:27 -0800
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: agross@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
jshriram@...eaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, mturquette@...libre.com,
psodagud@...eaurora.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, tdas@...eaurora.org,
tsoni@...eaurora.org, vinod.koul@...aro.org,
vnkgutta@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] clk: qcom: rpmh: Add support for RPMH clocks on
SM8250
On Wed 22 Jan 22:46 PST 2020, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Venkata Narendra Kumar Gutta (2020-01-16 15:39:49)
> > @@ -490,6 +512,7 @@ static int clk_rpmh_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > { .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sdm845},
> > { .compatible = "qcom,sm8150-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sm8150},
> > { .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sc7180},
> > + { .compatible = "qcom,sm8250-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sm8250},
>
> We should sort this on compatible.
>
Yes we should, in case this was a request I sent out a patch for this:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20200124175934.3937473-1-bjorn.andersson@linaro.org/
Regards,
Bjorn
> > { }
> > };
> > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, clk_rpmh_match_table);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists