[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMp4zn_WXwxJ6Md4rgFzdAY_xea4TmVDdQc1iJDObEMm5Yc79g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 12:09:37 -0800
From: Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me>
To: Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.ws>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] seccomp: Add SECCOMP_USER_NOTIF_FLAG_PIDFD to get
pidfd on listener trap
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 10:03 AM Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.ws> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 01:17:42AM -0800, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
> > Currently, this just opens the group leader of the thread that triggere
> > the event, as pidfds (currently) are limited to group leaders.
>
> I don't love the semantics of this; when they're not limited to thread
> group leaders any more, we won't be able to change this. Is that work
> far off?
>
> Tycho
We would be able to change this in the future if we introduced a flag like
SECCOMP_USER_NOTIF_FLAG_PIDFD_THREAD which would send a
pidfd that's for the thread, and not just the group leader. The flag could
either be XOR with SECCOMP_USER_NOTIF_FLAG_PIDFD, or
could require both. Alternatively, we can rename
SECCOMP_USER_NOTIF_FLAG_PIDFD to
SECCOMP_USER_NOTIF_FLAG_GROUP_LEADER_PIDFD.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists