[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5878067.luYmtVZgP3@debian64>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 22:38:21 +0100
From: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@...il.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] usb: xhci: Add support for Renesas USB controllers
On Tuesday, 21 January 2020 21:26:34 CET Christian Lamparter wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 7:46 AM Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > hey Christian,
> >
> > On 13-01-20, 21:33, Christian Lamparter wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 9:10 PM John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 12:42 AM Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > This series add support for Renesas USB controllers uPD720201 and uPD720202.
> > > > > These require firmware to be loaded and in case devices have ROM those can
> > > > > also be programmed if empty. If ROM is programmed, it runs from ROM as well.
> > > > >
> > > > > This includes two patches from Christian which supported these controllers
> > > > > w/o ROM and later my patches for ROM support and multiple firmware versions,
> > > > > debugfs hook for rom erase and export of xhci-pci functions.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks so much for updating these! They are working ok for me in my
> > > > testing on db845c.
> > > >
> > > > Tested-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
> > >
> > > Nice! I'll definitely give this series another try on my WNDR4700 too
> > > (PowerPC Arch)
> > > this weekend.
> > >
> > > and from me: Thanks!
> >
> > Did you get around to test these?
>
> Not yet, I was too optimistic that I could get current linux-usb with the
> patches running on the WNDR4700 (due to APM82181) over the
> weekend. Do you think that It still counts, if I'm going with 5.4.11 on
> OpenWrt instead? Because then I just swap out the old patches from
> my OpenWrt APM821XX branch:
> <https://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/staging/chunkeey.git;a=commit;h=4dd6f62a36a3724f0363d639cd9e29e04d7b62c0>
>
> and don't have to figure out what broke with linux-usb on the APM821xx.
I could get 5.4.11 to boot on the Netgear WNDR4700 :-).
(This has a APM82181 SoC (PowerPC 464))
Here's faillog from the "plain xhci-pci" driver:
[ 375.481868] xhci_hcd 0000:45:00.0: xHCI Host Controller
[ 375.487149] xhci_hcd 0000:45:00.0: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 1
[ 385.494590] xhci_hcd 0000:45:00.0: can't setup: -110
[ 385.499558] xhci_hcd 0000:45:00.0: USB bus 1 deregistered
[ 385.504963] xhci_hcd 0000:45:00.0: init 0000:45:00.0 fail, -110
[ 385.510889] xhci_hcd: probe of 0000:45:00.0 failed with error -110
(Notice how it gets stuck for 10 seconds there).
And this is the successlog from the xhci-pci-renesas module
[ 391.555559] renesas xhci 0000:45:00.0: xHCI Host Controller
[ 391.561171] renesas xhci 0000:45:00.0: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 1
[ 391.575068] renesas xhci 0000:45:00.0: hcc params 0x014051cf hci version 0x100 quirks 0x0000000101000090
[ 391.586750] hub 1-0:1.0: USB hub found
[ 391.592601] hub 1-0:1.0: 2 ports detected
[ 391.597199] renesas xhci 0000:45:00.0: xHCI Host Controller
[ 391.602797] renesas xhci 0000:45:00.0: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 2
[ 391.610537] renesas xhci 0000:45:00.0: Host supports USB 3.0 SuperSpeed
[ 391.617719] usb usb2: We don't know the algorithms for LPM for this host, disabling LPM.
[ 391.626495] hub 2-0:1.0: USB hub found
[ 391.630570] hub 2-0:1.0: 2 ports detected
this is when I added the usb 3.0-stick:
[ 775.403928] usb 2-2: new SuperSpeed Gen 1 USB device number 3 using renesas xhci
[ 775.432684] usb-storage 2-2:1.0: USB Mass Storage device detected
[ 775.439238] scsi host1: usb-storage 2-2:1.0
[ 776.482556] scsi 1:0:0:0: Direct-Access SanDisk Ultra 1.00 PQ: 0 ANSI: 6
[ 776.492181] sd 1:0:0:0: [sda] 60063744 512-byte logical blocks: (30.8 GB/28.6 GiB)
[ 776.501193] sd 1:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
[ 776.507047] sd 1:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: disabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
[ 776.524893] sda: sda1 sda2
[ 776.531062] sd 1:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI removable disk
root@(none):/dev# hdparm -t /dev/sda
/dev/sda:
Timing buffered disk reads: 466 MB in 3.01 seconds = 154.98 MB/sec
and this is the log from my usb 2.0-memorystick:
[ 1187.113650] usb 2-2: USB disconnect, device number 3
[ 1195.867397] usb 1-2: new high-speed USB device number 2 using renesas xhci
[ 1195.895171] usb-storage 1-2:1.0: USB Mass Storage device detected
[ 1195.901848] scsi host1: usb-storage 1-2:1.0
[ 1196.962583] scsi 1:0:0:0: Direct-Access SanDisk Cruzer Blade 1.00 PQ: 0 ANSI: 6
[ 1196.978772] sd 1:0:0:0: [sda] 30031872 512-byte logical blocks: (15.4 GB/14.3 GiB)
[ 1196.988529] sd 1:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
[ 1196.994498] sd 1:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: disabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
[ 1197.020407] sda: sda1
[ 1197.030458] sd 1:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI removable disk
root@(none):/dev# hdparm -t /dev/sda
/dev/sda:
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 3.01 seconds = 21.28 MB/sec
These speeds for usb3 and usb2 are within what the device can do.
So, everything is working fine with the v6.
Tested-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@...il.com>
Cheers,
Christian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists