linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] ide/MIPS/docs: remove no longer used au1xxx-ide driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 24 Jan 2020 15:03:45 -0800
From:   Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>
To:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
        James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ide/MIPS/docs: remove no longer used au1xxx-ide
 driver

Hi David & Jonathan,

On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 01:29:35PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Since patch #2 depends on patch #1 (and it is also the best to
> apply patch #3 after driver code removal) it would be probably
> easiest to merge everything through MIPS tree (after getting
> necessary ACKs, from David for the first patch and Jonathan for
> the third one).

Does that sound good to you? If so could you ack the patches as
appropriate?

Alternatively I have no problem if you'd rather take this through the
IDE tree David, in which case for patch 2:

    Acked-by: Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>

Thanks,
    Paul