linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Fix linked-list KUnit test when run multiple times

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABVgOSnVLyOAYMi2eFaOXtm96SdmrO8hmJ4f2gKbDJ7wS_8d5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 24 Jan 2020 15:13:28 -0800
From:   David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
To:     Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
Cc:     shuah <shuah@...nel.org>,
        KUnit Development <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix linked-list KUnit test when run multiple times

On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 2:01 PM Brendan Higgins
<brendanhiggins@...gle.com> wrote:
> Oh good, I am glad we are getting rid of those static variables. (I
> thought we already dropped those - whoops.) I think this drops this
> last of them, can you confirm David?

Yeah, this is the last of them.

I vaguely recall a suggestion that it may be worth testing that the
LIST_HEAD() macro works with static, but as mentioned in the
description, the for_each_entry_* tests probably aren't the best place
to do that anyway...

-- David