linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/irq: don't use current_stack_pointer() in check_stack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200124085830.GT3191@gate.crashing.org>
Date:   Fri, 24 Jan 2020 02:58:30 -0600
From:   Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
To:     Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
Cc:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/irq: don't use current_stack_pointer() in check_stack_overflow()

On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 07:03:36AM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> >Le 24/01/2020 à 06:46, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
> >>
> >>If I do this it seems to work, but feels a little dicey:
> >>
> >>    asm ("" : "=r" (r1));
> >>    sp = r1 & (THREAD_SIZE - 1);
> >
> >
> >Or we could do add in asm/reg.h what we have in boot/reg.h:
> >
> >register void *__stack_pointer asm("r1");
> >#define get_sp()    (__stack_pointer)
> >
> >And use get_sp()
> >
> 
> It works, and I guess doing it this way is acceptable as it's exactly 
> what's done for current in asm/current.h with register r2.

That is a *global* register variable.  That works.  We still need to
document a bit better what it does exactly, but this is the expected
use case, so that will work.

> Now I (still) get:
> 
> 	sp = get_sp() & (THREAD_SIZE - 1);
>  b9c:	54 24 04 fe 	clrlwi  r4,r1,19
> 	if (unlikely(sp < 2048)) {
>  ba4:	2f 84 07 ff 	cmpwi   cr7,r4,2047
> 
> Allthough GCC 8.1 what doing exactly the same with the form CLANG don't 
> like:
> 
> 	register unsigned long r1 asm("r1");
> 	long sp = r1 & (THREAD_SIZE - 1);
>  b84:	54 24 04 fe 	clrlwi  r4,r1,19
> 	if (unlikely(sp < 2048)) {
>  b8c:	2f 84 07 ff 	cmpwi   cr7,r4,2047

Sure, if it did what you expected, things will usually work out fine ;-)

(Pity that the compiler didn't come up with
    rlwinm. r4,r1,0,19,20
    bne bad
Or are the low bits of r4 used later again?)


Segher