lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:16:48 +0100
From:   Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc:     Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>,
        Dave Olsthoorn <dave@...aar.me>, x86@...nel.org,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 03/10] firmware: Rename FW_OPT_NOFALLBACK to
 FW_OPT_NOFALLBACK_SYSFS

Hi,

On 1/24/20 9:57 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 05:35:47PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> This is a preparation patch for adding a new platform fallback mechanism,
>> which will have its own enable/disable FW_OPT_xxx option.
>>
>> Note this also fixes a typo in one of the re-wordwrapped comments:
>> enfoce -> enforce.
>>
>> Acked-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
> 
> I've taken this in my tree for now in a quest to try to get others to
> pay attention to this series...

Thank you.

As mentioned before I believe that this series is ready for merging now.

Andy Lutomirski had one last change request for v12 of the second
patch in the series, specifically to replace the loop searching for
the prefix with a memem, but the kernel does not have memmem.

Andy, are you ok with v12 as is, given that we don't have memmem ?

Assuming Andy is ok with v12 as is, then to merge this we need
to probably wait for 5.6-rc1 and then have the x86/efi folks do
an immutable branch with the first 2 patches of the series.

After that you (Greg) can merge patches 3-10 (after merging the
branch) and the platform/drivers/x86 folks can take 11 and 12
(also after merging the branch).

Regards,

Hans

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ