[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200124092813.549446778@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:30:49 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 048/102] gpiolib: No need to call gpiochip_remove_pin_ranges() twice
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
commit 2f4133bb5f14f49a99acf0cc55b84996dbfb4dff upstream.
of_gpiochip_add(), when fails, calls gpiochip_remove_pin_ranges().
ADD:
gpiochip_add_data_with_key() ->
of_gpiochip_add() -> (ERROR path)
gpiochip_remove_pin_ranges()
At the same time of_gpiochip_remove() calls exactly the above mentioned
function unconditionally and so does gpiochip_remove().
REMOVE:
gpiochip_remove() ->
gpiochip_remove_pin_ranges()
of_gpiochip_remove() ->
gpiochip_remove_pin_ranges()
Since gpiochip_remove() calls gpiochip_remove_pin_ranges() unconditionally,
we have duplicate call to the same function when it's not necessary.
Move gpiochip_remove_pin_ranges() from of_gpiochip_add() to gpiochip_add()
to avoid duplicate calls and be consistent with the explicit call in
gpiochip_remove().
Fixes: e93fa3f24353 ("gpiolib: remove duplicate pin range code")
Depends-on: f7299d441a4d ("gpio: of: Fix of_gpiochip_add() error path")
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c | 5 +----
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
@@ -909,16 +909,13 @@ int of_gpiochip_add(struct gpio_chip *ch
of_node_get(chip->of_node);
ret = of_gpiochip_scan_gpios(chip);
- if (ret) {
+ if (ret)
of_node_put(chip->of_node);
- gpiochip_remove_pin_ranges(chip);
- }
return ret;
}
void of_gpiochip_remove(struct gpio_chip *chip)
{
- gpiochip_remove_pin_ranges(chip);
of_node_put(chip->of_node);
}
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -1452,6 +1452,7 @@ err_remove_of_chip:
gpiochip_free_hogs(chip);
of_gpiochip_remove(chip);
err_free_gpiochip_mask:
+ gpiochip_remove_pin_ranges(chip);
gpiochip_free_valid_mask(chip);
err_remove_from_list:
spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
@@ -1507,8 +1508,8 @@ void gpiochip_remove(struct gpio_chip *c
gdev->chip = NULL;
gpiochip_irqchip_remove(chip);
acpi_gpiochip_remove(chip);
- gpiochip_remove_pin_ranges(chip);
of_gpiochip_remove(chip);
+ gpiochip_remove_pin_ranges(chip);
gpiochip_free_valid_mask(chip);
/*
* We accept no more calls into the driver from this point, so
Powered by blists - more mailing lists