linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 149/639] net/mlx5: Take lock with IRQs disabled to avoid deadlock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200124093105.887220381@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:25:19 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Moni Shoua <monis@...lanox.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 149/639] net/mlx5: Take lock with IRQs disabled to avoid deadlock

From: Moni Shoua <monis@...lanox.com>

[ Upstream commit 33814e5d127e21f53b52e17b0722c1b57d4f4d29 ]

The lock in qp_table might be taken from process context or from
interrupt context. This may lead to a deadlock unless it is taken with
IRQs disabled.

Discovered by lockdep

================================
WARNING: inconsistent lock state
4.20.0-rc6
--------------------------------
inconsistent {HARDIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-HARDIRQ-W}

python/12572 [HC1[1]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] takes:
00000000052a4df4 (&(&table->lock)->rlock#2){?.+.}, /0x50 [mlx5_core]
{HARDIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
  _raw_spin_lock+0x33/0x70
  mlx5_get_rsc+0x1a/0x50 [mlx5_core]
  mlx5_ib_eqe_pf_action+0x493/0x1be0 [mlx5_ib]
  process_one_work+0x90c/0x1820
  worker_thread+0x87/0xbb0
  kthread+0x320/0x3e0
  ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30
irq event stamp: 103928
hardirqs last  enabled at (103927): [] nk+0x1a/0x1c
hardirqs last disabled at (103928): [] unk+0x1a/0x1c
softirqs last  enabled at (103924): [] tcp_sendmsg+0x31/0x40
softirqs last disabled at (103922): [] 80

other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0
       ----
  lock(&(&table->lock)->rlock#2);

    lock(&(&table->lock)->rlock#2);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

Fixes: 032080ab43ac ("IB/mlx5: Lock QP during page fault handling")
Signed-off-by: Moni Shoua <monis@...lanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/qp.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/qp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/qp.c
index f33707ce8b6b0..479ac21cdbc69 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/qp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/qp.c
@@ -44,14 +44,15 @@ static struct mlx5_core_rsc_common *mlx5_get_rsc(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev,
 {
 	struct mlx5_qp_table *table = &dev->priv.qp_table;
 	struct mlx5_core_rsc_common *common;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
-	spin_lock(&table->lock);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&table->lock, flags);
 
 	common = radix_tree_lookup(&table->tree, rsn);
 	if (common)
 		atomic_inc(&common->refcount);
 
-	spin_unlock(&table->lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&table->lock, flags);
 
 	if (!common) {
 		mlx5_core_warn(dev, "Async event for bogus resource 0x%x\n",
-- 
2.20.1