[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200124030212.qjlzz75dgt5kla7t@vireshk-i7>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 08:32:12 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc: arnd@...db.de, jassisinghbrar@...il.com, cristian.marussi@....com,
peng.fan@....com, peter.hilber@...nsynergy.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] firmware: arm_scmi: Make scmi core independent of the
transport type
On 23-01-20, 10:30, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 187 at drivers/base/dd.c:519 really_probe+0x11c/0x418
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 1 PID: 187 Comm: kworker/1:2 Not tainted 5.5.0-rc7-00026-gf7231cd3108d-dirty #20
> Hardware name: ARM LTD ARM Juno Development Platform/ARM Juno Development Platform, BIOS EDK II Jan 16 2020
> Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func
> pstate: 80000005 (Nzcv daif -PAN -UAO)
> pc : really_probe+0x11c/0x418
> lr : really_probe+0x10c/0x418
> Call trace:
> really_probe+0x11c/0x418
> driver_probe_device+0xe4/0x138
> __device_attach_driver+0x90/0x110
> bus_for_each_drv+0x80/0xd0
> __device_attach+0xdc/0x160
> device_initial_probe+0x18/0x20
> bus_probe_device+0x98/0xa0
> deferred_probe_work_func+0x90/0xe0
> process_one_work+0x1ec/0x4a8
> worker_thread+0x210/0x490
> kthread+0x110/0x118
> ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
> ---[ end trace 06f96d55ce6093a8 ]---
linux-next didn't had a WARN at line 519 and so I looked at the
difference between your and my branch and reached to this patch:
commit 7c35e699c88bd60734277b26962783c60e04b494
Author: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Date: Fri Dec 6 14:22:19 2019 +0100
driver core: Print device when resources present in really_probe()
If a device already has devres items attached before probing, a warning
backtrace is printed. However, this backtrace does not reveal the
offending device, leaving the user uninformed. Furthermore, using
WARN_ON() causes systems with panic-on-warn to reboot.
Fix this by replacing the WARN_ON() by a dev_crit() message.
Abort probing the device, to prevent doing more damage to the device's
resources.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191206132219.28908-1-geert+renesas@glider.be
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/base/dd.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c
index d811e60610d3..b25bcab2a26b 100644
--- a/drivers/base/dd.c
+++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
@@ -516,7 +516,10 @@ static int really_probe(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
atomic_inc(&probe_count);
pr_debug("bus: '%s': %s: probing driver %s with device %s\n",
drv->bus->name, __func__, drv->name, dev_name(dev));
- WARN_ON(!list_empty(&dev->devres_head));
+ if (!list_empty(&dev->devres_head)) {
+ dev_crit(dev, "Resources present before probing\n");
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
re_probe:
dev->driver = drv;
-------------------------8<-------------------------
I think this defines the problem somewhat, though I wasn't able to
reproduce the problem on my platform :)
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists