lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <157994897444.396.410592911890723402.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date:   Sat, 25 Jan 2020 10:42:54 -0000
From:   "tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        x86 <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [tip: core/rcu] rcu: Use CONFIG_PREEMPTION where appropriate

The following commit has been merged into the core/rcu branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     90326f0521a88004194f88f1b597b54347482b5c
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/90326f0521a88004194f88f1b597b54347482b5c
Author:        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
AuthorDate:    Tue, 15 Oct 2019 21:18:14 +02:00
Committer:     Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
CommitterDate: Mon, 09 Dec 2019 12:37:51 -08:00

rcu: Use CONFIG_PREEMPTION where appropriate

The config option `CONFIG_PREEMPT' is used for the preemption model
"Low-Latency Desktop". The config option `CONFIG_PREEMPTION' is enabled
when kernel preemption is enabled which is true for the preemption model
`CONFIG_PREEMPT' and `CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT'.

Use `CONFIG_PREEMPTION' if it applies to both preemption models and not
just to `CONFIG_PREEMPT'.

Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Cc: rcu@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
 include/linux/rcupdate.h | 4 ++--
 kernel/rcu/Kconfig       | 4 ++--
 kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c  | 2 +-
 kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c    | 2 +-
 kernel/rcu/tree.c        | 4 ++--
 kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h    | 2 +-
 kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 4 ++--
 7 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index 70a41cd..eb32fff 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ static inline void exit_tasks_rcu_finish(void) { }
  *
  * This macro resembles cond_resched(), except that it is defined to
  * report potential quiescent states to RCU-tasks even if the cond_resched()
- * machinery were to be shut off, as some advocate for PREEMPT kernels.
+ * machinery were to be shut off, as some advocate for PREEMPTION kernels.
  */
 #define cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs() \
 do { \
@@ -598,7 +598,7 @@ do {									      \
  *
  * You can avoid reading and understanding the next paragraph by
  * following this rule: don't put anything in an rcu_read_lock() RCU
- * read-side critical section that would block in a !PREEMPT kernel.
+ * read-side critical section that would block in a !PREEMPTION kernel.
  * But if you want the full story, read on!
  *
  * In non-preemptible RCU implementations (pure TREE_RCU and TINY_RCU),
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
index 0303934..1cc940f 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
+++ b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
@@ -201,8 +201,8 @@ config RCU_NOCB_CPU
 	  specified at boot time by the rcu_nocbs parameter.  For each
 	  such CPU, a kthread ("rcuox/N") will be created to invoke
 	  callbacks, where the "N" is the CPU being offloaded, and where
-	  the "p" for RCU-preempt (PREEMPT kernels) and "s" for RCU-sched
-	  (!PREEMPT kernels).  Nothing prevents this kthread from running
+	  the "p" for RCU-preempt (PREEMPTION kernels) and "s" for RCU-sched
+	  (!PREEMPTION kernels).  Nothing prevents this kthread from running
 	  on the specified CPUs, but (1) the kthreads may be preempted
 	  between each callback, and (2) affinity or cgroups can be used
 	  to force the kthreads to run on whatever set of CPUs is desired.
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
index dee043f..121a050 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
@@ -1730,7 +1730,7 @@ static void rcu_torture_fwd_cb_cr(struct rcu_head *rhp)
 // Give the scheduler a chance, even on nohz_full CPUs.
 static void rcu_torture_fwd_prog_cond_resched(unsigned long iter)
 {
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)) {
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPTION) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)) {
 		// Real call_rcu() floods hit userspace, so emulate that.
 		if (need_resched() || (iter & 0xfff))
 			schedule();
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c
index 44d6606..6208c1d 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__srcu_read_unlock);
 
 /*
  * Workqueue handler to drive one grace period and invoke any callbacks
- * that become ready as a result.  Single-CPU and !PREEMPT operation
+ * that become ready as a result.  Single-CPU and !PREEMPTION operation
  * means that we get away with murder on synchronization.  ;-)
  */
 void srcu_drive_gp(struct work_struct *wp)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 1694a6b..c9dbb05 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2698,9 +2698,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kfree_call_rcu);
 
 /*
  * During early boot, any blocking grace-period wait automatically
- * implies a grace period.  Later on, this is never the case for PREEMPT.
+ * implies a grace period.  Later on, this is never the case for PREEMPTION.
  *
- * Howevr, because a context switch is a grace period for !PREEMPT, any
+ * Howevr, because a context switch is a grace period for !PREEMPTION, any
  * blocking grace-period wait automatically implies a grace period if
  * there is only one CPU online at any point time during execution of
  * either synchronize_rcu() or synchronize_rcu_expedited().  It is OK to
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
index d632cd0..98d078c 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ static void rcu_exp_handler(void *unused)
 	}
 }
 
-/* PREEMPT=y, so no PREEMPT=n expedited grace period to clean up after. */
+/* PREEMPTION=y, so no PREEMPTION=n expedited grace period to clean up after. */
 static void sync_sched_exp_online_cleanup(int cpu)
 {
 }
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index ed54d36..8cdce11 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -789,7 +789,7 @@ static void __init rcu_bootup_announce(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * Note a quiescent state for PREEMPT=n.  Because we do not need to know
+ * Note a quiescent state for PREEMPTION=n.  Because we do not need to know
  * how many quiescent states passed, just if there was at least one since
  * the start of the grace period, this just sets a flag.  The caller must
  * have disabled preemption.
@@ -839,7 +839,7 @@ void rcu_all_qs(void)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_all_qs);
 
 /*
- * Note a PREEMPT=n context switch.  The caller must have disabled interrupts.
+ * Note a PREEMPTION=n context switch. The caller must have disabled interrupts.
  */
 void rcu_note_context_switch(bool preempt)
 {

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ