[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <157994896332.396.1777066129603404272.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2020 10:42:43 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Lai Jiangshan" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [tip: core/rcu] rcu: Clear .exp_hint only when deferred quiescent
state has been reported
The following commit has been merged into the core/rcu branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 2eeba5838fd8c5e19bb91e25624116936348e7af
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/2eeba5838fd8c5e19bb91e25624116936348e7af
Author: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>
AuthorDate: Fri, 01 Nov 2019 04:06:22 -07:00
Committer: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
CommitterDate: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:27:33 -08:00
rcu: Clear .exp_hint only when deferred quiescent state has been reported
Currently, the .exp_hint flag is cleared in rcu_read_unlock_special(),
which works, but which can also prevent subsequent rcu_read_unlock() calls
from helping expedite the quiescent state needed by an ongoing expedited
RCU grace period. This commit therefore defers clearing of .exp_hint
from rcu_read_unlock_special() to rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore(),
thus ensuring that intervening calls to rcu_read_unlock() have a chance
to help end the expedited grace period.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index 8cdce11..7487c79 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -444,6 +444,7 @@ rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long flags)
local_irq_restore(flags);
return;
}
+ t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.exp_hint = false;
t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.deferred_qs = false;
if (special.b.need_qs) {
rcu_qs();
@@ -610,7 +611,6 @@ static void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data);
struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode;
- t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.exp_hint = false;
exp = (t->rcu_blocked_node && t->rcu_blocked_node->exp_tasks) ||
(rdp->grpmask & rnp->expmask) ||
tick_nohz_full_cpu(rdp->cpu);
@@ -640,7 +640,6 @@ static void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
local_irq_restore(flags);
return;
}
- WRITE_ONCE(t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.exp_hint, false);
rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore(t, flags);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists