linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.19 000/639] 4.19.99-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 25 Jan 2020 11:32:59 +0000
From:   Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        <shuah@...nel.org>, <patches@...nelci.org>,
        <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>, <lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org>,
        <stable@...r.kernel.org>, linux-tegra <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 000/639] 4.19.99-stable review


On 24/01/2020 18:07, Jon Hunter wrote:
> 
> On 24/01/2020 17:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 02:50:05PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>> Hi Greg,
>>>
>>> On 24/01/2020 09:22, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.99 release.
>>>> There are 639 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>>> let me know.
>>>>
>>>> Responses should be made by Sun, 26 Jan 2020 09:26:29 +0000.
>>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>>
>>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>>> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.99-rc1.gz
>>>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>>> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y
>>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>>
>>>> thanks,
>>>>
>>>> greg k-h
>>>>
>>>> -------------
>>>> Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>>> Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>>>>     PCI: PM: Skip devices in D0 for suspend-to-idle
>>>
>>> The above commit is causing a suspend regression on Tegra124 Jetson-TK1.
>>> Reverting this on top of v4.19.99-rc1 fixes the issue.
>>
>> This is also in the 4.14 queue, so should I drop it there too?
> 
> I did not see any failures with the same board on that branch, so I
> would say no, but odd that it only fails here. It was failing for me
> 100% so I would have expected to see if there too if it was a problem.

Hmmm, rc2 still not working for me ...

Test results for stable-v4.19:
    11 builds:	11 pass, 0 fail
    22 boots:	22 pass, 0 fail
    32 tests:	30 pass, 2 fail

Linux version:	4.19.99-rc2-g24832ad2c623
Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
                tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana,
                tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra30-cardhu-a04

I still see the following commit in rc2 ...

commit bb52152abe85f971278a7a4f033b29483f64bfdb
Author: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Date:   Thu Jun 13 23:59:45 2019 +0200

    PCI: PM: Skip devices in D0 for suspend-to-idle

BTW, I checked the 4.14. queue and I do not see the above change in
there, however, there is similar change ...

Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
    PCI: PM: Avoid possible suspend-to-idle issue

Cheers
Jon

-- 
nvpublic