[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a413396eed8390fc95fedabae9ae5afb@sk2.org>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2020 12:52:23 +0100
From: Stephen Kitt <steve@....org>
To: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
David Zhou <David1.Zhou@....com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>
Cc: amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
steve@....org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] amdgpu: use dma-resv API instead of manual kmalloc
And of course I forgot this is an internal API, so this doesn't work
without some of other stuff which isn't ready.
Please ignore...
Regards,
Stephen
Le 25/01/2020 12:46, Stephen Kitt a écrit :
> Instead of hand-coding the dma_resv_list allocation, use
> dma_resv_list_alloc, which masks the shared_max handling. While we're
> at it, since we only need shared_count fences, allocate shared_count
> fences rather than shared_max.
>
> (This is the only place in the kernel, outside of dma-resv.c, which
> touches shared_max. This suggests we'd probably be better off without
> it!)
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Kitt <steve@....org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
> index 888209eb8cec..aec595752200 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
> @@ -234,12 +234,11 @@ static int
> amdgpu_amdkfd_remove_eviction_fence(struct amdgpu_bo *bo,
> if (!old)
> return 0;
>
> - new = kmalloc(offsetof(typeof(*new), shared[old->shared_max]),
> - GFP_KERNEL);
> + new = dma_resv_list_alloc(old->shared_count);
> if (!new)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - /* Go through all the shared fences in the resevation object and sort
> + /* Go through all the shared fences in the reservation object and
> sort
> * the interesting ones to the end of the list.
> */
> for (i = 0, j = old->shared_count, k = 0; i < old->shared_count; ++i)
> {
> @@ -253,7 +252,6 @@ static int
> amdgpu_amdkfd_remove_eviction_fence(struct amdgpu_bo *bo,
> else
> RCU_INIT_POINTER(new->shared[k++], f);
> }
> - new->shared_max = old->shared_max;
> new->shared_count = k;
>
> /* Install the new fence list, seqcount provides the barriers */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists