[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <157996851987.2524.2577321446102599250@skylake-alporthouse-com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2020 16:08:39 +0000
From: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
To: Wambui Karuga <wambui.karugax@...il.com>, airlied@...ux.ie,
daniel@...ll.ch, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rodrigo.vivi@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915/gem: conversion to new drm logging macros
Quoting Wambui Karuga (2020-01-22 12:57:48)
> This series is a part of the conversion to the new struct drm_device
> based logging macros in drm/i915.
> This series focuses on the drm/i915/gem directory and converts all
> straightforward instances of the printk based logging macros to the new
> macros.
Overall, I'm not keen on this as it perpetuates the mistake of putting
client debug message in dmesg and now gives them even more an air of
being device driver debug messages. We need a mechanism by which we
report the details of what a client did wrong back to that client
(tracefs + context/client getparam to return an isolated debug fd is my
idea).
> Wambui Karuga (2):
> drm/i915/gem: initial conversion to new logging macros using
> coccinelle.
> drm/i915/gem: manual conversion to struct drm_device logging macros.
Still this is a necessary evil for the current situation,
Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
-Chris
Powered by blists - more mailing lists