linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH mk-II 08/17] asm-generic/tlb: Provide MMU_GATHER_TABLE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200126155205.GA19169@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Sun, 26 Jan 2020 07:52:05 -0800
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Nick Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
        Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
        Nick Hu <nickhu@...estech.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mk-II 08/17] asm-generic/tlb: Provide
 MMU_GATHER_TABLE_FREE

On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 10:32:05AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> As described in the comment, the correct order for freeing pages is:
> 
>  1) unhook page
>  2) TLB invalidate page
>  3) free page
> 
> This order equally applies to page directories.
> 
> Currently there are two correct options:
> 
>  - use tlb_remove_page(), when all page directores are full pages and
>    there are no futher contraints placed by things like software
>    walkers (HAVE_FAST_GUP).
> 
>  - use MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE and tlb_remove_table() when the
>    architecture does not do IPI based TLB invalidate and has
>    HAVE_FAST_GUP (or software TLB fill).
> 
> This however leaves architectures that don't have page based
> directories but don't need RCU in a bind. For those, provide
> MMU_GATHER_TABLE_FREE, which provides the independent batching for
> directories without the additional RCU freeing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> ---

Various sparc64 builds (allnoconfig, tinyconfig, as well as builds
with SMP disabled):

mm/mmu_gather.c: In function '__tlb_remove_table_free':
mm/mmu_gather.c:101:3: error: implicit declaration of function '__tlb_remove_table'; did you mean 'tlb_remove_table'?

Guenter