linux-kernel - [for-next][PATCH 3/7] tracing: Set kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200126192020.793380330@goodmis.org>
Date:   Sun, 26 Jan 2020 14:19:35 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>
Subject: [for-next][PATCH 3/7] tracing: Set kernel_stacks caller size properly

From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>

I noticed when trying to use the trace-cmd python interface that reading the raw
buffer wasn't working for kernel_stack events.  This is because it uses a
stubbed version of __dynamic_array that doesn't do the __data_loc trick and
encode the length of the array into the field.  Instead it just shows up as a
size of 0.  So change this to __array and set the len to FTRACE_STACK_ENTRIES
since this is what we actually do in practice and matches how user_stack_trace
works.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1411589652-1318-1-git-send-email-jbacik@fb.com

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>
[ Pulled from the archeological digging of my INBOX ]
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
 kernel/trace/trace_entries.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_entries.h b/kernel/trace/trace_entries.h
index fc8e97328e54..78c146efb862 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_entries.h
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_entries.h
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ FTRACE_ENTRY(kernel_stack, stack_entry,
 
 	F_STRUCT(
 		__field(	int,		size	)
-		__dynamic_array(unsigned long,	caller	)
+		__array(	unsigned long,	caller,	FTRACE_STACK_ENTRIES	)
 	),
 
 	F_printk("\t=> %ps\n\t=> %ps\n\t=> %ps\n"
-- 
2.24.1