[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200126192020.939296571@goodmis.org>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2020 14:19:36 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: [for-next][PATCH 4/7] tracing: Remove unneeded NULL check
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
We checked "iter->trace" earlier so there is no need to check here.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141122183012.GB6994@mwanda
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
[ Pulled from the archeological digging of my INBOX ]
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
kernel/trace/trace.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
index d1410b4462ac..6fed9b0a8d58 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -4224,7 +4224,7 @@ __tracing_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file, bool snapshot)
mutex_init(&iter->mutex);
/* Notify the tracer early; before we stop tracing. */
- if (iter->trace && iter->trace->open)
+ if (iter->trace->open)
iter->trace->open(iter);
/* Annotate start of buffers if we had overruns */
--
2.24.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists