linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 8/8] scsi: ufs: Select INITIAL adapt for HS Gear4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 25 Jan 2020 19:38:08 -0800
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To:     Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>, asutoshd@...eaurora.org,
        nguyenb@...eaurora.org, hongwus@...eaurora.org,
        rnayak@...eaurora.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...roid.com, saravanak@...gle.com, salyzyn@...gle.com
Cc:     Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
        Pedro Sousa <pedrom.sousa@...opsys.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
        Venkat Gopalakrishnan <venkatg@...eaurora.org>,
        Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
        Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 8/8] scsi: ufs: Select INITIAL adapt for HS Gear4

On 2020-01-22 23:25, Can Guo wrote:
> @@ -8422,7 +8433,8 @@ int ufshcd_init(struct ufs_hba *hba, void __iomem *mmio_base, unsigned int irq)
>  	if ((hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_10) &&
>  	    (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_11) &&
>  	    (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_20) &&
> -	    (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_21))
> +	    (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_21) &&
> +	    (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_30))
>  		dev_err(hba->dev, "invalid UFS version 0x%x\n",
>  			hba->ufs_version);

Is the UFS specification backwards compatible? Or in other words, does
the existing driver work fine for devices with a controller that
supports a newer version of the spec? I'm asking this because in Linux
kernel driver a version check that excludes newer controller versions is
very unusual. Can the above version check be removed in its entirety?

Thanks,

Bart.