linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915/gem: conversion to new drm logging macros

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <158011608131.25356.4337758241793042878@skylake-alporthouse-com>
Date:   Mon, 27 Jan 2020 09:08:01 +0000
From:   Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
To:     Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc:     Wambui Karuga <wambui.karugax@...il.com>, airlied@...ux.ie,
        daniel@...ll.ch, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
        joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        rodrigo.vivi@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915/gem: conversion to new drm logging macros

Quoting Daniel Vetter (2020-01-27 09:05:57)
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 04:08:39PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Quoting Wambui Karuga (2020-01-22 12:57:48)
> > > This series is a part of the conversion to  the new struct drm_device
> > > based logging macros in drm/i915.
> > > This series focuses on the drm/i915/gem directory and converts all
> > > straightforward instances of the printk based logging macros to the new
> > > macros.
> > 
> > Overall, I'm not keen on this as it perpetuates the mistake of putting
> > client debug message in dmesg and now gives them even more an air of
> > being device driver debug messages. We need a mechanism by which we
> > report the details of what a client did wrong back to that client
> > (tracefs + context/client getparam to return an isolated debug fd is my
> > idea).
> 
> Sean is working on that, but it's a global thing still.

Go look at how I suggest we can use tracefs in that thread :)
-Chris